How much products actually contain
No product states its amount yet.
Of the products containing it, 22 list it before the 1% line and 1 after it (usually 1% or less).
Products using this ingredient
12 of 22 confirmed · likeliest to carry enough first · See all 22
hinceMood Enhancer Matte
LYS BeautyLYS Beauty Higher Standard Satin Matte Cream Blush
RAUSCHSeaweed Scalp Pack
SAM'USENSITIVE POCKET SUN STICK
AnuaAnua Invisible Glow Finish Sunstick
KAHIKAHI CV Shine Fit Sun Stick
KAHIKAHI CV Shine Fit Sun Stick
medicubemedicube PDRN Silky Sun Stick
Summer FridaysSummer Fridays Sheer Skin Tint
EADEMEADEM Sunsuede
Peach & LilyPeach & Lily Redness Relief Color Correcting Moisturizer
ATOPALMZinc Mild Up Sun Cream 65g
Definition
US FDA substance register · UNII YCD50O0Z6L · registered name DIETHYLHEXYL CARBONATE · single chemical substance
Cosmetic roles
Safety & regulatory references
Reviewed by CIR: Final Report: Safety Assessment of Dialkyl Carbonates as Used in Cosmetics
More data — names, identifiers, properties, test records, literature
Official labels & definitions
JCIA labelling name 炭酸ジエチルヘキシル: 本品は、炭酸と２－エチルヘキシルアルコールとのジエステルであり、次の化学式で表される。
Source: JCIA labelling names (Japan)
Names & identifiers
- CAS No.chemical registry number
- 14858-73-2
- EC No.EU chemical inventory number
- 238-925-9
- DTXSIDUS EPA chemical ID
- DTXSID60864544
- DTXCIDUS EPA compound ID
- DTXCID70813048
- IUPAC
- Bis(2-ethylhexyl) carbonate
- Molecular formula
- C17H34O3
- Molecular weight
- 286.456 g/mol
What products actually use it for
What the 7 products reported to the US EPA with this ingredient use it for. Products outside cosmetics are included, so the top few rows are its main uses.
- Softener and conditioner7
Source: US EPA CompTox dashboard
Irritation and sensitisation studies
4 skin studies and 1 eye studies are on record.
The studies disagree (the most common conclusion covers 25%), so they do not establish that this ingredient is irritating. These tests are on the raw material itself; irritation at the amount in a finished product is a different question.
See all 5 studies
- Not likely to be sensitizing
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA) · Screening · according to OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation) adopted 17th July 1992 according to OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay) Draft Version November 2000 - Not likely to be sensitizing
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA) · Screening · according to OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation) July 17, 1992 according to EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation) 29 December 1992 - Severe Irritation
skin irritation: in vivo · Screening · OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion) 17 July 1992 according to EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion) 29 December 1992 according to - Not likely to be sensitizing
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA) · Screening · according to OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation) July 17, 1992 according to EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation) May 30, 2008 - Studies Indicate No Significant Irritation
eye irritation: in vivo · Screening · OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion) 17 July 1992 according to EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion) 29 December 1992 according to
Source: US EPA CompTox dashboard
Linked databases 13
- China inventory of existing ingredients (IECIC)
- EU CosIng ingredient list 2
- JCIA labelling names (Japan)
- Korea Cosmetic Association ingredient dictionary
- MFDS (Korea) cosmetic ingredient register 2
- NIST Chemistry WebBook
- UniChem cross-reference IDs
- US Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) 2
- US EPA CompTox dashboard 2
- US EPA DSSTox chemical database
- US FDA substance registration (GSRS)
- US FDA Unique Ingredient Identifier (UNII)
- Wikidata