Are the "skin-nourishing" shots Korean clinics promote really just fillers?
On Taiwan's PTT forum (facelift board), someone who had been drawn in by Korean clinic ads looked closer at the "skin-nourishing injections" many Gangnam dermatology clinics were pushing. The listed products turned out to be different versions of Juvelook, plus Radiesse. In Taiwan, the poster said, these are used as fillers for hollows, nasolabial folds and jawline support. So why market them as skin care shots, and do they help hydration or radiance at all?
Here is what the replies said:
-
Some explained that the small-particle version is commonly used in Korea as a "glass skin" type treatment aimed at pores and texture, while the larger-particle version and Radiesse lean towards structural support.
-
Others said Radiesse that is heavily diluted and spread evenly in shallow layers is meant to stimulate collagen, which is a different technique from filling.
-
One person worried that large-particle products placed too shallow could cause nodules or lumps.
-
Many felt the marketing language changes fast: anything that stimulates collagen gets renamed "regenerative" or "skin-nourishing" because it sounds gentler.
-
The last few replies agreed that dose, injection depth and the doctor matter most.
The shared takeaway: a softer name does not mean a different product, so ask exactly what is being injected.
Desk note: In its guidance on dermal (soft tissue) fillers, the US FDA lists possible risks including nodules or granulomas under the skin, and flags unintentional injection into a blood vessel, which can block blood supply to tissue, as the most concerning. Whatever the treatment is called, confirm the product name, amount and injection depth first, and let a qualified doctor assess whether it suits you.
If a clinic recommends a treatment with an unfamiliar name, what is the first question you would ask?
Original thread: PTT facelift board — are Korean "skin shots" just fillers? · Source: FDA
No comments yet. Be the first.